Errotica Archives
Your Pages Recently Viewed
Your Content Recently Viewed

Pulseight Comments

  • 0

Boring. Over-all Matiss, these sets are at BEST, amateurish. From a bloke I had included in my "Top Five" 'artists' at M-A, your work here, at this site which hasn't the restraints of the parent site, is pathetic. Had Angela Linin or Natasha Schon had professed their ownership, I would understood the blandness, the obsessive need to present the background in preference to the model, is the MO of those two dropkicks.

But coming from you, Matiss, disappointment old mate, is incalculable!!

You ARE one of the Best, Matiss, but these sets you have presented of Genevieve are morbidly pathetic. When the background has more spice than the model presented.

Pull your finger out Matiss. You have the world at your fingertips. Don't drop the ball - for fuck's-sake.

  • 0

My opinion Matiss, this is a cold and soul-less set. A model as petite and feminine as Stefany should be adorned is soft, sexy lingerie when she enters the set. All you have managed do do is shoot a naked female - bland and boring with no erotic nuance anywhere.
Shame on you Sir, far from your best - but not far from your worst effort:((

  • 1

Violla, along with Matiss, always produce some of the most tantalizingly seductive sets to be found on this collection of sites.

Sadly, there are no videos of this of this exquisite Angel, who presents herself with total honesty and confidence, secure in the knowledge she is driving us all nuts!!:-)

This would be a golden opportunity to debut Violla on Met-ArtX - even on Sex_Art - with pics and videos to see her at her most vibrant and sensual best.

  • 0

Superb my friend. You have presented the Beautiful Genevieve as she really is. Divinely sensual and totally sexy. Thanks to you both:)

  • 0

There are many better ways to hide a models' pussy. My favorite is inside soft, sexy, silken panties. With her hand is different. But it would get REALLY old, REALLY quickly.

  • 1

Absolutely a favorite set, Arturo:) You know how to bring out the best this Divine young Lady.
thank you Lily, for participating with such vigor and pep:)

  • 0

Not much happening here:( Lots of room for improvement in the second part of the set - but who knows when that will be. The worst delays have been 3 years, but it is 4 years & 2 months since this set was shot!!

  • 0

Why is it you have ignored one of the most popular models in the Met-Art group for thirteen (13) months??

Ardelia is so popular because of her natural, exquisite beauty and her work ethic of giving 100% of herself at all times. Ardelia NEVER looks like a cardboard cut-out, which is more than I can say for a few others!!

  • 2

I cannot understand why I am the only one to have noticed, since the sites' inception, almost all sets are posted in two halves!! In the 'good old days' the sets were separated by -s01 the next might be -s12 (example, numbers varied, depending on the number of sets inbetween) This meant the sets could be combined as one.
NOW, you no longer differentiate the sets. We, the mug subscribers, who pay bloody good money to access these sites, have to renumber each image of the second half of the first set, individually!!!!
My second gripe with this site, is its classification!!!! This site is supposed to be erotic glamour.soft porn. Well, excuse me, but there is nothing even slightly pornographic about the female genitalia, except when it is portrayed as a 'coin slot'. A pedophile would get off on it, but I don't.
By the same token, a wide-open vagina is going to be lubricated in anticipation of penetration. There is no-one running around with a clean-wipe removing evidence of her arousal.
Most of the models on these sites, seriously get off on the thought of their teasing is making a grumpy old grump like me, hard. (Better than any chemical pill, I can tell you:-) So If the model is aroused, she's confident in her work, secure in the company of the crew, and is enjoying her work. That's what I like to see. Lubricated pussies:-)
It only becomes pornographic when children or animals are depicted. The rest is just nature taking its course. And there is NOTHING pornographic about that!!!!

  • 0

Of all the female photographers submitting work to Met-Art and their affiliates, only two know their job and who do it well.
Flora, you are one of those two. This is a top video. Amelie's MUA has done a stunning job, her make-up and hair are perfect for the scenario, enhancing Amelie's undeniable beauty.
Amelie is both sensual and seductive throughout, making this work a stand-out. A perfect 10 imho:) Congratulations to all involved, with special thanks to Amelie for bringing herself to the screen so vividly.

  • 0

Global warming is B/S!! The proof is here in Sweet Gala's eyes. She could, and IS, melting the Polar Ice-cap with her exquisitely blue eyes. She turns me to water every time I look at her sets:-) I think she would turn me into steam, and I'd evaporate if we were in the same room with her;-)

What really slays me though, is when I look at your identical-twins' sets at M-A. With you Alisa G Both in the Ukraine, it's no wonder the northern-hemisphere weather is so volatile:-)

  • -3

Go back to your day job Flora.

  • -1

Congratulations Flora. A graduation from dull greys to hued black and white. Where is your imagination????? Stuck to the soles of your feet?????

  • 0

My only comment would be more detrimental than than the last!!! Absolute shit!! Adel, at M-A makes my top ten!!!!!! Here, unless there is a HUGE improvement, I'll be deleteing the f@*%ing lot!! Tony Murano was her artist at M-A. That would explain a LOT!!!

  • 1

FAR from your best work Flora. Whatever 'Realidad' means, you produced a set of stark reality, for sure. It didn't do much for Adele though. I've no probs with freckles, there is evidence of foundations, but that's where it stopped!! Her eyes were lifeless, and her lips dry and dull. Sorry Babe, you've done much better work than this.

  • 0

Beautiful model, ideal setting, great photography. All aspects we've come to appreciate from Alex Iskan.

But just ONE set of the Stunning Anita in 9 months???? Has E-A closed down or what????

  • 0

Brilliant to see Nataly back after a break of 30 odd months:-) Should the time lapse be significant:-)?? The Good News is she's BACK. The even BETTER news is she has some unfinished business here, by way of some incomplete sets.
Roll out the sets, wipe the cobwebs off the camera, clean the lens and Let's Get On With It!!:-)

  • 0

You have to get back to the days when honesty in photography prevailed. The days when models and photographers enjoyed their mutual respect and worked to produce the best possible results for the people who deserve the best, the Paying subscribers.
Nataly is a beautiful model, and Erro, great camera work, even in the set you appear to be focusing on what seems to be a 'baby bump';-)??

  • 1

If a higher score than 10 were available, Nataly in this set would score it. Her sex-sational panties and internal pussy juices demand it.

  • 0

Very disappointing work from James Claudel. Surely, as a professional, he would have noticed with Anita's very fair skin, the center of attention is the brown timber framed furniture. Her lips have no color and I wasn't too happy with her eye-liner either.
Anita is a stunning model, but could have been made-up better.
James Claudel - 7/10. Anita 10/10.

  • 0

B/S!! Through no fault of the model or photographer, Met-Art's decree that no wet pussies are allowed on these two otherwise great sites is obvious. Met-Art says that only dried up old prunes are allowed here, because they have other 'More Explicit' sites you can pay extra for, for anything truly erotic.

The models are still the best, but they must perform like store-front dummies, no animation or excitement and certainly do not enjoy the sitting. And the lack of realism is P-ing me off.

  • 0

A delightful set of a stunningly beautiful young woman. #'s 72 & 73 are the pick of a great selection of pussy close-ups. Nelya obviously enjoyed the session and got off teasing in front of the camera.

Well Done Nelya & Arturo:)

  • 2

Erotic photography at it's most graphic best:)) Beautiful work from both ARTURO and COCCINELLE. Dedicated commitment to the genre. Beautiful color, stunning poses, and perfect sets. Congratulations to all concerned in delivering some of the finest erotic photography imaginable.
I could never tire of Cocchinelle's fabulous beauty, physical appearance and her enthusiasm to perform.

  • 0

By-line - Few of us, me included, cannot afford to join EVERY site to get what we want, when TWO were doing the job bloody nicely.

  • 0

This girl is a 10 every day of the week. She scores only 7 because the photographer forgot he wasn't shooting a store dummy. He was shooting a real, live, beautiful female, and forgot to include her in the shoot, forgot to get her to participate. Dead and uninteresting sets.

This site, and M-A have got to understand you're not adhering to your first paragraph in your own "Philosophy". Your are simply NOT delivering what your subscribers want. We want LIVE models who show their enthusiasm for the job they're doing, and who they're doing it for. Both model and photographer are 'the best paid in the business' - YOUR words, but you are NOT Delivering what you promised.

  • 1

Girls playing lesbians badly - AGAIN!!

  • 1

This photographer has not done her justice. She is worthy of better.

  • 0

I must be losing my marbles!!:( It has taken me 4 months to down-load this incredible set of the stunning Emilia. I'll be checking back more frequently for more of this gorgeous, sensual young woman. Thank you Dolce, your crew and Emilia for the stunning art you have created.

  • 0

You said it yourself, my friend. "A Significant Percentage....." It's been my observation that a model who is wearing something, anything, be it lingerie, swimwear or jeans and T-shirt, will be more provocative in her nude scenes than a model who starts naked. Starting naked, there's little to warm up to.
These girls work in situations where many people are involved. Nerves play a significant part. If they can't warm up to the crowd, how are they going to warm up to the camera?

  • 1

I am looking forward to Emily's comments on her bio. I hope she doesn't copy Anna AJ "...and oysters, they're both slimy." (As she did on Met-Art). Oysters are only slimy when they're old and unclean, and their aphrodisiac qualities make a great entree to any romantic meal.

Leonardo and Emily, thank you both for some remarkable, high quality erotica.

Leonardo, thank you for the file size. 160 images (in my mind), is about a perfect set size. The image size is also great!!:)

  • 0

With the exception of LAMBADA, s4 & s7, the rest is bland and dull. You might consider a re-write of the first paragraph of your own Philosophy!! In MY mind, there is NOTHING erotic about head, tits or feet shots.
I read also, that the models and photographers are the best paid in the business, so whose decision was it to obliterate a wet pussy? It's a natural occurrence, when a model is confident with her photographic crew, enough to relax and let events take their course. Unfortunately, some retarded Grandma has decided that a model cannot be seen enjoying herself!! That's so sick it's beyond Victorian!! It's Puritanical!! Remember the Mayflower and the Puritans that sailed on her???? This is where Met-Art and Errotic Archives is heading.
My $600.00+p.a. should be worth more to you than just supplying a pretty face!! It certainly is to me!!

  • -1

This rates my first comment. Dull to the extreme!!

  • 0

Girls Behaving Inanely!! Dull!!

  • 0

Great to see you keeping abreast (pun intended) of this gorgeous, natural young lady. Keep up the Good Work:)

  • 0

Very happy to see Arturo's great work with Mila:) How about getting her to add some thoughts to her bio?

  • 0

I was sad to read in LILLY's bio, that folk considered her a slut for enjoying 'one-night stands'. I thought Europeans were much more sophisticated and worldly-wise than those of us with the British (Victorian) heritage. She is obviously a very forth-right and down-to-earth young lady:)

  • 0

I am an idiot!! Perhaps I should have looked further up the page before opening my mouth. Putting the brain into gear first, would have helped also!!

  • 0

Her last set in these archives. What a huge loss of talent and beauty. Too Much of LILLY is never enough. Please return her to your stable of excellent models.

  • 0

My favorite of all her sets here. Images 71, 72 & 73 have captured her pussy in absolute perfection. Very animated and expressive.

  • 0

LADA has been portrayed in mud, sand and sea. Has anyone considered her in sexy lingerie though? She's one sexy lady, has been truly aroused in some of her sets, although only 5 of the 1037 images taken from these Archives have evidence of this. I am pleased that she has 3 new sets added since I was last here, and hope to see more of her in the future.

  • 2

This model and her photographer are both more than a mere 10 point rating!! KAMI is not afraid to get aroused in her shoots, and ERRO isn't afraid to capture it. A real turn-on viewing her sets here:)

  • 3

My eternal gratitude to Flora and her team for GISELE's "Allegro" set. Eight sets and 652 images in these archive, and GISELE is actually tuned in and turned on:) Thanks too, to GISELE for letting go and going with the flow;)

  • 0

Gentlemen, I opened my files of GIA way back on 26/03/2010, and find it terribly sad, that in the ensuing 3 years, she only rates 3 sets! I'd give my right arm to meet her in a sauna, but would be almost as satisfied with more shots of her very expressive little pussy here in ErroticaArchives:)

  • 0

Thank you to the shooters, MUAH's and crew who brought us this exquisite young lady:) Please don't delay in posting more of her sets!! She certainly took me through that spiral she talks about in her bio!!:)
I did notice, however, am unnecessary and excessive use o tissues during her sets! GALA was on fire through most, though the evidence was tampered with. In only 3 images, perhaps four, was there a hint of vaginal fluids. As Met-Art's Amy A states in her bio, "A woman's body is one of the best creations and a woman's emotions in erotic photography is especially positive and enjoyable." I like to see a model like GALA so tuned in and turned on as she obviously is, totally natural. So please don't tamper with the evidence.

  • 1

Here's a "Protip" for you guys who prefer models to be naked from Go to Whoa. There is not much more confronting to a model than having to start naked. Give her a chance to warm to the theme, before stripping her. She will 'express her pleasure' in the shoot much more willingly. Being a labia fanatic, give me a model with juice in her pussy over boobs, any day. That said, I hate sets ending with the model clothed! It's worse than taking a cold shower. After all, the girl is showing and deriving pleasure personally, stuffs it all up by getting dressed! I don't figure that at all.
Bravo, Erro, for your stunning work. You have few equals when it comes to making a model feel so comfortable and relaxed, she can cum during the shoot:)

  • 3

My eternal gratitude to Flora and her team for GISELE's "Allegro" set. Eight sets and 652 images in these archive, and GISELE is actually tuned in and turned on:) Thanks too, to GISELE for letting go and going with the flow;)

  • 2

I cannot understand why I am the only one to have noticed, since the sites' inception, almost all sets are posted in two halves!! In the 'good old days' the sets were separated by -s01 the next might be -s12 (example, numbers varied, depending on the number of sets inbetween) This meant the sets could be combined as one.
NOW, you no longer differentiate the sets. We, the mug subscribers, who pay bloody good money to access these sites, have to renumber each image of the second half of the first set, individually!!!!
My second gripe with this site, is its classification!!!! This site is supposed to be erotic glamour.soft porn. Well, excuse me, but there is nothing even slightly pornographic about the female genitalia, except when it is portrayed as a 'coin slot'. A pedophile would get off on it, but I don't.
By the same token, a wide-open vagina is going to be lubricated in anticipation of penetration. There is no-one running around with a clean-wipe removing evidence of her arousal.
Most of the models on these sites, seriously get off on the thought of their teasing is making a grumpy old grump like me, hard. (Better than any chemical pill, I can tell you:-) So If the model is aroused, she's confident in her work, secure in the company of the crew, and is enjoying her work. That's what I like to see. Lubricated pussies:-)
It only becomes pornographic when children or animals are depicted. The rest is just nature taking its course. And there is NOTHING pornographic about that!!!!

  • 2

Erotic photography at it's most graphic best:)) Beautiful work from both ARTURO and COCCINELLE. Dedicated commitment to the genre. Beautiful color, stunning poses, and perfect sets. Congratulations to all concerned in delivering some of the finest erotic photography imaginable.
I could never tire of Cocchinelle's fabulous beauty, physical appearance and her enthusiasm to perform.

  • 2

This model and her photographer are both more than a mere 10 point rating!! KAMI is not afraid to get aroused in her shoots, and ERRO isn't afraid to capture it. A real turn-on viewing her sets here:)

  • 1

Violla, along with Matiss, always produce some of the most tantalizingly seductive sets to be found on this collection of sites.

Sadly, there are no videos of this of this exquisite Angel, who presents herself with total honesty and confidence, secure in the knowledge she is driving us all nuts!!:-)

This would be a golden opportunity to debut Violla on Met-ArtX - even on Sex_Art - with pics and videos to see her at her most vibrant and sensual best.

  • 1

Absolutely a favorite set, Arturo:) You know how to bring out the best this Divine young Lady.
thank you Lily, for participating with such vigor and pep:)

  • 1

FAR from your best work Flora. Whatever 'Realidad' means, you produced a set of stark reality, for sure. It didn't do much for Adele though. I've no probs with freckles, there is evidence of foundations, but that's where it stopped!! Her eyes were lifeless, and her lips dry and dull. Sorry Babe, you've done much better work than this.

  • 1

If a higher score than 10 were available, Nataly in this set would score it. Her sex-sational panties and internal pussy juices demand it.

  • 1

Girls playing lesbians badly - AGAIN!!

  • 1

This photographer has not done her justice. She is worthy of better.

  • 1

I am looking forward to Emily's comments on her bio. I hope she doesn't copy Anna AJ "...and oysters, they're both slimy." (As she did on Met-Art). Oysters are only slimy when they're old and unclean, and their aphrodisiac qualities make a great entree to any romantic meal.

Leonardo and Emily, thank you both for some remarkable, high quality erotica.

Leonardo, thank you for the file size. 160 images (in my mind), is about a perfect set size. The image size is also great!!:)

  • 1

Here's a "Protip" for you guys who prefer models to be naked from Go to Whoa. There is not much more confronting to a model than having to start naked. Give her a chance to warm to the theme, before stripping her. She will 'express her pleasure' in the shoot much more willingly. Being a labia fanatic, give me a model with juice in her pussy over boobs, any day. That said, I hate sets ending with the model clothed! It's worse than taking a cold shower. After all, the girl is showing and deriving pleasure personally, stuffs it all up by getting dressed! I don't figure that at all.
Bravo, Erro, for your stunning work. You have few equals when it comes to making a model feel so comfortable and relaxed, she can cum during the shoot:)

  • 0

Boring. Over-all Matiss, these sets are at BEST, amateurish. From a bloke I had included in my "Top Five" 'artists' at M-A, your work here, at this site which hasn't the restraints of the parent site, is pathetic. Had Angela Linin or Natasha Schon had professed their ownership, I would understood the blandness, the obsessive need to present the background in preference to the model, is the MO of those two dropkicks.

But coming from you, Matiss, disappointment old mate, is incalculable!!

You ARE one of the Best, Matiss, but these sets you have presented of Genevieve are morbidly pathetic. When the background has more spice than the model presented.

Pull your finger out Matiss. You have the world at your fingertips. Don't drop the ball - for fuck's-sake.

  • 0

My opinion Matiss, this is a cold and soul-less set. A model as petite and feminine as Stefany should be adorned is soft, sexy lingerie when she enters the set. All you have managed do do is shoot a naked female - bland and boring with no erotic nuance anywhere.
Shame on you Sir, far from your best - but not far from your worst effort:((

  • 0

Superb my friend. You have presented the Beautiful Genevieve as she really is. Divinely sensual and totally sexy. Thanks to you both:)

  • 0

There are many better ways to hide a models' pussy. My favorite is inside soft, sexy, silken panties. With her hand is different. But it would get REALLY old, REALLY quickly.

  • 0

Not much happening here:( Lots of room for improvement in the second part of the set - but who knows when that will be. The worst delays have been 3 years, but it is 4 years & 2 months since this set was shot!!

  • 0

Why is it you have ignored one of the most popular models in the Met-Art group for thirteen (13) months??

Ardelia is so popular because of her natural, exquisite beauty and her work ethic of giving 100% of herself at all times. Ardelia NEVER looks like a cardboard cut-out, which is more than I can say for a few others!!

  • 0

Of all the female photographers submitting work to Met-Art and their affiliates, only two know their job and who do it well.
Flora, you are one of those two. This is a top video. Amelie's MUA has done a stunning job, her make-up and hair are perfect for the scenario, enhancing Amelie's undeniable beauty.
Amelie is both sensual and seductive throughout, making this work a stand-out. A perfect 10 imho:) Congratulations to all involved, with special thanks to Amelie for bringing herself to the screen so vividly.

  • 0

Global warming is B/S!! The proof is here in Sweet Gala's eyes. She could, and IS, melting the Polar Ice-cap with her exquisitely blue eyes. She turns me to water every time I look at her sets:-) I think she would turn me into steam, and I'd evaporate if we were in the same room with her;-)

What really slays me though, is when I look at your identical-twins' sets at M-A. With you Alisa G Both in the Ukraine, it's no wonder the northern-hemisphere weather is so volatile:-)

  • 0

My only comment would be more detrimental than than the last!!! Absolute shit!! Adel, at M-A makes my top ten!!!!!! Here, unless there is a HUGE improvement, I'll be deleteing the f@*%ing lot!! Tony Murano was her artist at M-A. That would explain a LOT!!!

  • 0

Beautiful model, ideal setting, great photography. All aspects we've come to appreciate from Alex Iskan.

But just ONE set of the Stunning Anita in 9 months???? Has E-A closed down or what????

  • 0

Brilliant to see Nataly back after a break of 30 odd months:-) Should the time lapse be significant:-)?? The Good News is she's BACK. The even BETTER news is she has some unfinished business here, by way of some incomplete sets.
Roll out the sets, wipe the cobwebs off the camera, clean the lens and Let's Get On With It!!:-)

  • 0

You have to get back to the days when honesty in photography prevailed. The days when models and photographers enjoyed their mutual respect and worked to produce the best possible results for the people who deserve the best, the Paying subscribers.
Nataly is a beautiful model, and Erro, great camera work, even in the set you appear to be focusing on what seems to be a 'baby bump';-)??

  • 0

Very disappointing work from James Claudel. Surely, as a professional, he would have noticed with Anita's very fair skin, the center of attention is the brown timber framed furniture. Her lips have no color and I wasn't too happy with her eye-liner either.
Anita is a stunning model, but could have been made-up better.
James Claudel - 7/10. Anita 10/10.

  • 0

B/S!! Through no fault of the model or photographer, Met-Art's decree that no wet pussies are allowed on these two otherwise great sites is obvious. Met-Art says that only dried up old prunes are allowed here, because they have other 'More Explicit' sites you can pay extra for, for anything truly erotic.

The models are still the best, but they must perform like store-front dummies, no animation or excitement and certainly do not enjoy the sitting. And the lack of realism is P-ing me off.

  • 0

A delightful set of a stunningly beautiful young woman. #'s 72 & 73 are the pick of a great selection of pussy close-ups. Nelya obviously enjoyed the session and got off teasing in front of the camera.

Well Done Nelya & Arturo:)

  • 0

By-line - Few of us, me included, cannot afford to join EVERY site to get what we want, when TWO were doing the job bloody nicely.

  • 0

This girl is a 10 every day of the week. She scores only 7 because the photographer forgot he wasn't shooting a store dummy. He was shooting a real, live, beautiful female, and forgot to include her in the shoot, forgot to get her to participate. Dead and uninteresting sets.

This site, and M-A have got to understand you're not adhering to your first paragraph in your own "Philosophy". Your are simply NOT delivering what your subscribers want. We want LIVE models who show their enthusiasm for the job they're doing, and who they're doing it for. Both model and photographer are 'the best paid in the business' - YOUR words, but you are NOT Delivering what you promised.

  • 0

I must be losing my marbles!!:( It has taken me 4 months to down-load this incredible set of the stunning Emilia. I'll be checking back more frequently for more of this gorgeous, sensual young woman. Thank you Dolce, your crew and Emilia for the stunning art you have created.

  • 0

You said it yourself, my friend. "A Significant Percentage....." It's been my observation that a model who is wearing something, anything, be it lingerie, swimwear or jeans and T-shirt, will be more provocative in her nude scenes than a model who starts naked. Starting naked, there's little to warm up to.
These girls work in situations where many people are involved. Nerves play a significant part. If they can't warm up to the crowd, how are they going to warm up to the camera?

  • 0

With the exception of LAMBADA, s4 & s7, the rest is bland and dull. You might consider a re-write of the first paragraph of your own Philosophy!! In MY mind, there is NOTHING erotic about head, tits or feet shots.
I read also, that the models and photographers are the best paid in the business, so whose decision was it to obliterate a wet pussy? It's a natural occurrence, when a model is confident with her photographic crew, enough to relax and let events take their course. Unfortunately, some retarded Grandma has decided that a model cannot be seen enjoying herself!! That's so sick it's beyond Victorian!! It's Puritanical!! Remember the Mayflower and the Puritans that sailed on her???? This is where Met-Art and Errotic Archives is heading.
My $600.00+p.a. should be worth more to you than just supplying a pretty face!! It certainly is to me!!

  • 0

Girls Behaving Inanely!! Dull!!

  • 0

Great to see you keeping abreast (pun intended) of this gorgeous, natural young lady. Keep up the Good Work:)

  • 0

Very happy to see Arturo's great work with Mila:) How about getting her to add some thoughts to her bio?

  • 0

I was sad to read in LILLY's bio, that folk considered her a slut for enjoying 'one-night stands'. I thought Europeans were much more sophisticated and worldly-wise than those of us with the British (Victorian) heritage. She is obviously a very forth-right and down-to-earth young lady:)

  • 0

I am an idiot!! Perhaps I should have looked further up the page before opening my mouth. Putting the brain into gear first, would have helped also!!

  • 0

Her last set in these archives. What a huge loss of talent and beauty. Too Much of LILLY is never enough. Please return her to your stable of excellent models.

  • 0

My favorite of all her sets here. Images 71, 72 & 73 have captured her pussy in absolute perfection. Very animated and expressive.

  • 0

LADA has been portrayed in mud, sand and sea. Has anyone considered her in sexy lingerie though? She's one sexy lady, has been truly aroused in some of her sets, although only 5 of the 1037 images taken from these Archives have evidence of this. I am pleased that she has 3 new sets added since I was last here, and hope to see more of her in the future.

  • 0

Gentlemen, I opened my files of GIA way back on 26/03/2010, and find it terribly sad, that in the ensuing 3 years, she only rates 3 sets! I'd give my right arm to meet her in a sauna, but would be almost as satisfied with more shots of her very expressive little pussy here in ErroticaArchives:)

  • 0

Thank you to the shooters, MUAH's and crew who brought us this exquisite young lady:) Please don't delay in posting more of her sets!! She certainly took me through that spiral she talks about in her bio!!:)
I did notice, however, am unnecessary and excessive use o tissues during her sets! GALA was on fire through most, though the evidence was tampered with. In only 3 images, perhaps four, was there a hint of vaginal fluids. As Met-Art's Amy A states in her bio, "A woman's body is one of the best creations and a woman's emotions in erotic photography is especially positive and enjoyable." I like to see a model like GALA so tuned in and turned on as she obviously is, totally natural. So please don't tamper with the evidence.

  • -1

Congratulations Flora. A graduation from dull greys to hued black and white. Where is your imagination????? Stuck to the soles of your feet?????

  • -1

This rates my first comment. Dull to the extreme!!

  • -3

Go back to your day job Flora.

  • 0

That is perfectly fine. That doesn't mean the photographs where she is clothed need be used for the set.